Subject:
|
Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Jul 1999 04:17:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
898 times
|
| |
|
|
Forget that,
I want the highest possible number.
32767?
65536?
4294967296?
No I got it:
31337!
How about rank by number of website hits, or GB of data
transfer?
KL
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> dkrenz wrote:
> >
> > Mike Stanley wrote:
>
> > > I care. I was born in 69. I'd like 69.
> > >
> > > Whatever scheme you adopt that allows me to get 69 would be good.
>
> I suspect a lot of us feel that way. But about ourselves. I already said
> I want #2, though.
>
> --
> Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
> - - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
> fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
> lugnet.
>
> NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
> will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
