Subject:
|
Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 3 Jul 1999 00:46:59 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIENIAZEK@nospamNOVERA.COM
|
Viewed:
|
480 times
|
| |
|
|
I care. I think you should hand out numbers in strict numerical order
based on when you first started using Lugnet.
That would make you #0, Suzanne #1 and me #2. I've always wanted to be a
#2.
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> Any opinions on how LUGNET member #'s should be allocated/assigned?
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
| (...) Which part of it -- I assume you mean the news part? By "using" do you mean posting to? I have to say, that option has a lot of attractiveness simply for its straightforwardness, objectiveness, and "ruthless fairness." But I didn't want to (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Allocation of member #'s
|
| Any opinions on how LUGNET member #'s should be allocated/assigned? Here are some possibilities: - One possibility is simply to start at 1 and count upward on a first- come, first-serve basis, one number at a time. (I think this might be what ICQ (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
|
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
