 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
|
(...) I care. I was born in 69. I'd like 69. Whatever scheme you adopt that allows me to get 69 would be good. I'm sure everyone would agree. (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
|
(...) Oh, absolutely ;-) 22(1) (1)Julie - born on the 22nd of Dec. (26 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
|
(...) I suspect a lot of us feel that way. But about ourselves. I already said I want #2, though. (26 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Allocation of member #'s
|
|
Forget that, I want the highest possible number. 32767? 65536? 4294967296? No I got it: 31337! How about rank by number of website hits, or GB of data transfer? KL (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|