 | | Re: Off Topic: New location for Austalia
|
| (...) But he wants a lugnet.loc.au.nz to enforce the OZ view that nz is part of au. You might as well give into the MOZ view that au is part of nz. :-) (26 years ago, 24-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Off Topic: New location for Austalia
|
| (...) Oh. I see. Jamie: All of the loc groups are parallelized and orthogonalized by country. The two-letter designators (that is, the xx's in lugnet.loc.xx) are the countries' respective Internet first-level domains, so as long as New Zealand has (...) (26 years ago, 25-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Off Topic: New location for Austalia
|
| (...) So where is lugnet.loc.gb then? It itself is a top level domain - I've noticed in the list that the Title for the UK was "UK of GB and NI" - I didn't know that GB and UK were essentially that different - an American proves me wrong :-) (26 years ago, 28-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | UK / Great Britain
|
| (...) You're serious, then? Hmm, I don't think I've never ever seen it used. Do you remember where did you heard/saw that? (...) But I got that information straight from the CIA. :-) Please correct me if it's wrong. Here is the URL: (URL) .loc.uk to (...) (25 years ago, 29-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: UK / Great Britain
|
| (...) I've never seen it used - I've only ever seen a place offering you to sell you one once - that was deep in the Internet-Admin sites. I got it off (URL) - not exactly the most official place to find it but they must have got it from somewhere. (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: UK / Great Britain
|
| On Sun, 30 May 1999 21:43:03 GMT, Carbon 60 uttered the following profundities... (...) I thought that we were, but that the monarch, recently, kept out of the affairs of government, leaving it to Parliament to decide. I could be wrong.... (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | | Re: UK / Great Britain
|
| (...) To avoid being immediately replaced by a president, yeah. Royal houses do exercise great influence, still, but behind-the-screens for the most part. Jasper (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.uk)
| |
