 | | Abusive
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: -snip- (...) Terms of Use: "(do not) Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, or indecent information of any kind, including (...) (18 years ago, 3-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Abusive
|
| (...) Three posts with the exact same text? You're sounding a bit like a broken record. You might get a better reaction if you do more than cut and paste the same text when responding to posts. Jeff (18 years ago, 3-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Abusive
|
| (...) Jeff, I asked you twice to stay away from me. "(do not) Stray hopelessly off-topic without moving the discussion to a more appropriate location. (There is a fair amount of leeway here, since it is natural for discussions to drift, and moving a (...) (18 years ago, 3-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Abusive
|
| (...) Considering that everything I said is true my post is certainly not defamatory. And I certainly can't see anything obscene, vulgar, profane, or indecent in it either. It is arguably abusive (although equally arguably not due to the truth (...) (18 years ago, 3-Sep-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: (was some dumb argument) is something else now...
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: -snip- (...) -snip- (...) Oh forget that, check this out! Do you like it? Any suggestions? (URL) time doing creative things>> (18 years ago, 3-Sep-06, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: (was some dumb argument) is something else now...
|
| (...) Your Photoshop skills are certainly improving. The composition of that is quite good too. It seems to have a green tint to it though so I'd play with the colour levels a bit more. Also your posted pictures are too big. Try posting a shrunk (...) (18 years ago, 3-Sep-06, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | Re: (was some dumb argument) is something else now...
|
| That's ok, I had fun making it. It was also fun to just change the subject for once. (18 years ago, 3-Sep-06, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Abusive
|
| (...) Myself and many others have asked you on numerous occasions to shape up. Obviously we can't all get what we want. Jeff (18 years ago, 3-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Abusive
|
| So how exactly do we filter out Mr.Sophie? Is there a check box or something for that in our preferences? If there isn't, there really should be : ( Baring that, we should all simply setup our newsreaders to filter him. Then put an banner on the (...) (18 years ago, 5-Sep-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Abusive
|
| I apologize for replying to my own post, but I figured I'd share some step by step instructions on how to filter out Mr. Sophie, if you're using Mozilla Thunderbird to read Lugnet like I am : Click on 'Tools' from the top text menu bar. Select (...) (18 years ago, 5-Sep-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Abusive
|
| (...) Once again, by posting to a public forum the topic becomes public property in a sense. If you were to stand on a street corner mumbling your incoherent diatribes, you might possibly get the same sort of reactions. Why are you so surprised when (...) (18 years ago, 5-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: (was some dumb argument) is something else now...
|
| In lugnet.publish, Eric Sophie wrote: In regards to your picture, I have some crits on aesthetics. It seems that the shadows being cast from your models are becoming darker where they intersect with other shadows. It would be more interesting/ (...) (18 years ago, 8-Sep-06, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| |
