To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 13475 (+5)
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) Yes I should. I've just woken up (in the morning sense, not the metaphorical sense) enough to realise that my continued posting in this subthread is every bit as bad as your starting of it. Unless I see something I really disagree with I will (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) Thanks Tim, Mark, and Jeff for resolving this. -Suz (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: lowering noise
 
(...) Mark, I'm sorry I didn't have time last night to formulate a proper reply to this. I sort of went to bed thinking about how best to explain my view to Frank.. Now I'll reply to his post directly. But here I just want to state that I didn't (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
 
(...) YEAA!! Thanks for starting this thread. It's exactly the kind of thing I like to see happening right now. Remember too that there's the (URL) LUGNET Suggestions> area where you'll find many valuable ideas and discussions. -Suz (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz wrote: [snip] (...) No. (...) Six years ago there were two full-time administrators. Perhaps that sounds like a cheezy answer, because we naturally prefer to think of moral standards as unaffected by things like (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR