| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) I'm curious, is any action being taken against those who have been baiting Eric? I absolutely agree that Eric has committed TOS violations, but the degree of baiting that he has been subject to has no place on Lugnet, or at least would have (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
| | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) So am I. Well I can't say what has been on LUGNet 6 years ago, but I do agree that it shouldn't be a place for such treatment. Marco (19 years ago, 6-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz wrote: [snip] (...) No. (...) Six years ago there were two full-time administrators. Perhaps that sounds like a cheezy answer, because we naturally prefer to think of moral standards as unaffected by things like (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Dear Suzanne, Thank you for still being here and for not giving up on those of us who truly appreciate LUGNET. I don't know what the site was like six years ago but I've been keeping up with other AFOL's here weekly since 2001. I'd bereave if (...) (19 years ago, 9-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) You have said several times that LUGNET operation is bad for your health. I think the obvious conclusion is that you shut down LUGNET as soon as possible. What is more important than your health, after all? Fredrik (19 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Suz, I don't think this sounds like a cheesy answer in the slightest. I'm a true believer about the power of online community, but I for one also understand the dynamics of good and bad that are inherent to them. While it allows people to band (...) (19 years ago, 27-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |