 | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) I see no gaps in the robotics post sequence, so it must never have made it to the server. I think even if it was awaiting authentication, it would still be assigned a post number. It may have gotten caught in the hard drive hiccup. Frank (19 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
Last Thursday sometime after post 25482 was made to the lugnet.robotics newsgroup I posted a reply to the thread entitled Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms. It was posted as a reply to message #25475. For some reason that post does (...) (19 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem posting by email to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
|
(...) Same here when posting to any of the groups I post to for the past week, in fact, I even had this response when I attempted to mail my issue to admin@lugnet.com. If you can see this - then I can still post through the web. Danny (19 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem posting by email to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
|
(...) I'm having the same problem, same error message. I can post though the web, but not through email. I went through the process of re-registering my email account last week, but this has not solved the problem. Derek (19 years ago, 30-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Problem posting by email to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
|
I am trying to post by email to RTL Toronto and it keeps failing. The error I get is: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: lugnet.org.ca.rtltor...lugnet.com Technical (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) I've been muddling through ok so far... (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) .Castle and .General both look pretty sparse Ray (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) .Space is missing too. -Duane (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Why? Did the retyped ones make sense? >;-D JOHN (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Wow! Did you have to re-type all of those messages by hand? You're amazing! However, I notice that you made a bunch of typos in reposting my messages... Thanks for restoring all of this. What a pain in the roast that must have been for you. (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) .trains is still missing Thanks for all the painfully tedious work it must be restoring this. Tim (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Hrm... ok, whoops, missed otd. Restoring now, should be back soon. Let us know if any other missing areas are discovered. --Todd (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Any updates worth mentioning? I ask because I'm concerned that people will be denied access to my years of profound wisdom as archived in ot.debate. Dave! (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Thanks, Tim. We are aware of the problem and will restore data. -Suz (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20060124171103....ron.com... (...) What? No redundant RAID array??? (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) :) relax Dan, your the "good" Dan. and I thought it was decided that this was all Ross's fault. ;) <-- see im just kidding ross. (...) (monty python voice) Missing data? were DONE FOR!!!! (end voice) Thanks Todd,et all. now, about putting my (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
The entirety of lugnet.trains, lugnet.space, and lugnet.castle are gone. Others may be gone also. Frank (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Which Dan?!? Don't you drag me into the mess you made! AFAIK, there was a drive failure, and Todd is working with Pair to restore the missing data. (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) ya ya, I know. I read the MIT article as well. ;) (...) Wait a minute. 1100 and 1500 GMT. Where was ROSS at that time? (...) "Admin" ?? are you talking about Dan? opps. wrong Brick Lug. Chris (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) --SNIP-- (...) You can needn't bother with the tin foil hat Chris. They don't do anything anyway. LUGNET also just murfled posts in .build.schleim, .build.mecha and .trains. In fact, it murfled every post between about 1100 and 1500GMT today. (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
