 | | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) I've been muddling through ok so far... (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) .Castle and .General both look pretty sparse Ray (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) .Space is missing too. -Duane (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Why? Did the retyped ones make sense? >;-D JOHN (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Wow! Did you have to re-type all of those messages by hand? You're amazing! However, I notice that you made a bunch of typos in reposting my messages... Thanks for restoring all of this. What a pain in the roast that must have been for you. (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) .trains is still missing Thanks for all the painfully tedious work it must be restoring this. Tim (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Hrm... ok, whoops, missed otd. Restoring now, should be back soon. Let us know if any other missing areas are discovered. --Todd (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Any updates worth mentioning? I ask because I'm concerned that people will be denied access to my years of profound wisdom as archived in ot.debate. Dave! (19 years ago, 26-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Thanks, Tim. We are aware of the problem and will restore data. -Suz (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20060124171103....ron.com... (...) What? No redundant RAID array??? (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) :) relax Dan, your the "good" Dan. and I thought it was decided that this was all Ross's fault. ;) <-- see im just kidding ross. (...) (monty python voice) Missing data? were DONE FOR!!!! (end voice) Thanks Todd,et all. now, about putting my (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
The entirety of lugnet.trains, lugnet.space, and lugnet.castle are gone. Others may be gone also. Frank (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) Which Dan?!? Don't you drag me into the mess you made! AFAIK, there was a drive failure, and Todd is working with Pair to restore the missing data. (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) ya ya, I know. I read the MIT article as well. ;) (...) Wait a minute. 1100 and 1500 GMT. Where was ROSS at that time? (...) "Admin" ?? are you talking about Dan? opps. wrong Brick Lug. Chris (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: OT - did Lugnet just eat/lose al the .robotic threads?
|
|
(...) --SNIP-- (...) You can needn't bother with the tin foil hat Chris. They don't do anything anyway. LUGNET also just murfled posts in .build.schleim, .build.mecha and .trains. In fact, it murfled every post between about 1100 and 1500GMT today. (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for New Newsgroup: lugnet.batman
|
|
(...) I second this idea. - /-ndrew (19 years ago, 13-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for New Newsgroup: lugnet.batman
|
|
(...) Yeah, I thought of something like that also, but it seemed too generic to put the Batman theme into. I really think this is going to be a huge license for TLC and once sets start hitting the shelves, we will be seeing lots of Batman MOCs. It's (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for New Newsgroup: lugnet.batman
|
|
"Ken Dowd" <kadowd@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:Iszy1M.1zno@lugnet.com... (...) How about lugnet.lego.licensed? -Rob www.brickmodder.net (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Request for New Newsgroup: lugnet.batman
|
|
Set photos for the new Batman theme are beginning to surface on the web and they seem to be generating a good deal of excitment at other forums. Therefore I would like to request a new newsgroup: lugnet.batman (or maybe something like (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jan-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: new newsgroup for NXT
|
|
(...) Thanks for the comments. After reading them and thinking more about this, I'd prefer we do not create the new group. Some explanation: In the past, groups have been created of two general types: those for "product lines" which were created (...) (19 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
