 | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) I would think so...rather than .parts.prim and .parts.bmp -- unless there's a real clear advantage to having these separated. --Todd (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Put them all together. Steve (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy —John VanZwieten
|
| | | | | Primitives are handled by the primitives group, and should be sent to the group. I see no purpose in having them in the cad.dat.parts. What do you mean by "Dat versions of bitmaps"? -John Van Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Bitmaps that have been run through a BMP2DAT tool. Steve (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | (...) Otherwise known as TBOML The Bane Of My Life. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet.cad.dat heirarchy —Terry Keller
|
| | | | (...) Primitives are a special case. Right now, consideration and approval of any new primitive file is done by consensus of a small group of part authors. Anyone may suggest a primitive to that group. And new members can be added to that group, (...) (26 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
