 | | Re: group suggestion
|
| (...) Because people would think it is a good place to post scans? No, wait, Todd's blocked most binaries. How about lugnet.club.scan? Steve (26 years ago, 2-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: group suggestion
|
| no no no. I never suggested that it would be a place to post scans. The idea is that people could request scans and I could post a list of recent additions to the site. KL (...) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: group suggestion
|
| I didn't say you had suggested it, I said people would *think* it. Anyway, as I had pointed out, Todd's blocked most binaries, so mis-guided individuals could *try* to post as many scans as they like. It wouldn't work. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: group suggestion
|
| I noticed. I tried to post a graph of the utilization data he posted. KL (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: group suggestion
|
| (...) Steve/Kevin, I'd forgotten all about this! (The messages above are from 11 months ago, and in the meantime, Kevin has been using the .publish group as the next best thing.) Since the ng hierarchy has stablized much more now since last October (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: group suggestion
|
| .announce.brickshelf makes sense since the updates are essentially broadcasts and not really interactive. I was going to suggest publish.scans instead of db.scans, but publish.scans implies discussions about any type of scans while db.scans implies (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: group suggestion
|
| (...) Actually, .publish isn't supposed to be for talking about MOC's at all -- it's for talking about publishing per se: Photography techniques, imaging systems, WWW authoring tools, Internet service providers, legal issues, etc. Long ago, there (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
