|
|
 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Not necessarily. LUGNET does not have this ability, as I understand it. It is possible to construct an email that shows the "from:" as being from a lugnet.com email address, but, again, as I understand it, not to have the email actually be (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
| (...) I assume you mean they, the (other) admins? (...) Well maybe, but I'm not sure "should be expected to come to consensus" is very useful here. What if a majority do agree that an admin is a problem, but they can't all come to a consensus? At (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
| (...) The admin team has worked on a consensus basis, and the theory (OK, my theory) was that if a fellow admin was problematic enough to need to be removed, they would be the ones that would need to agree about it. A majority vote system might be (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
| (...) I would be interested to hear the rationale behind that statement, specifically why it is more of a safety valve than majority decision. The reason I ask is that I, as a non-admin, see it as *removing* a safety valve. ROSCO (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
| Just to make things clear...the views I expressed are my own, and not indicative of the rest on NELUG. Tom D (...) (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
