 | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee — Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | (...) For informal functions, that's probably a good idea. The LPRV, on the other hand, did/does have real power and responsibility: the power to change and steer and directly influence an important part of LUGNET's direction, and the responsibility (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote: <snip> (...) Nowhere in the charter did it say "stay on task and avoid time-consuming loops like debating personalities or picking apart past actions". Why would you create a charter with the working (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee — Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | | (...) That was my paraphrasing of the original information I saw about the purpose for the committee, I apologize for not being specific. (...) I'm assuming the "you" is directed at the LTT, and not me personally, so I'll respond as such. The (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | | | (...) <snip> (...) You are correct. I was referring to the LTT as a group. Had you been chair I would have had much more faith in the process. <snip> (...) It most certainly was what I received. (...) I do not beleive that the way Chris was (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | | (...) I think this is a fantastic discussion-- one that we started on the list, but (as I've said on the list) I *REALLY* want admin feedback like this from admins on a continual basis. Seriously, this is the most effectual I've felt yet about the (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote: Thanks, Kelly, for your comments about this. I have only one point I'd like to make: (...) Whereas I think it is inevitable *eventually*. That's not a slur against admins, it's just human nature. But (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Well, as far as I could tell, the LPRV pretty much just had the privilage to see the document before it went into effect. And, I'm not opposed to that, really. I mean, I fully recognize and support the desire to strengthen a document before (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LPRV? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Well, I had to pick somewhere to ask this, I chose here... I would like to know where the "V" came from? I never saw anything that started with "V" attached to (URL) the committee charter>, only the "V" in "review". Was it just a typo that (...) (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LPRV? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) The V in review. I didn't pick it! Matt did I think because he set up the list (1) I would have went with LPPRC (Lugnet Policy & Procedure Review Committee) Too late now though! 1 - you do-s the work you get-s to picks the acronymie-s (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
