 | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) Hi Kevin, Thanks for responding. I appreciate that the change was an experiment, and I figured that there was probably some rationale behind it. Was this change ever announced or described somewhere? If so, I imagine that my comments merely (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) The current system for updating the scan library is obviously not working, but I have a fix: Soon anyone with a Brickshelf account will be able to upload to the scan library. I'm still working on the details for how to handle them after they (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) The randomizing of the recent pages was an experiment the 23 folders on each recent page were randomized but it still had the appropriate 23 folders by modification date. There have been some complaints so it is back to modification order. The (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) Before December, what percentage of MOCs announced on Lugnet were in .space? Is it possible that part of the problem is that the most active group of builders (and possibly highlighters) has moved to another site? I don't mean to imply that (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
|
(...) I'm a paying member, didn't realise you were not. (I figured the people raising functionality concerns were paying members)... I'll try to try to remember to try it tonite. I forget where we should talk about BrickShelf functionality... prolly (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
