To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12610
12609  |  12611
Subject: 
Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:28:46 GMT
Viewed: 
283 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin Loch wrote:
   In lugnet.general, Shaun Sullivan wrote:

The randomizing of the recent pages was an experiment the 23 folders on each recent page were randomized but it still had the appropriate 23 folders by modification date. There have been some complaints so it is back to modification order. The home page was changed to show 6 of the most recent 100 folders and it is still that way, but the recent page starts at n=0 instead of n=6 now.

Hi Kevin,

Thanks for responding. I appreciate that the change was an experiment, and I figured that there was probably some rationale behind it. Was this change ever announced or described somewhere? If so, I imagine that my comments merely showcased my ignorance of current AFOL events. That aside, is Lugnet the best (preferred?) forum for raising Brickshelf issues of this ilk?

In any case, I hope my post wasn’t taken as mindless flaming or bartching. And above all else, let me be the first to thank you for changing it back!


Mmmmmmmmmmmmm, sequential MOC review ....


Shaun



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
 
(...) We have no forums at Brickshelf so Lugnet is the best place to discuss things like this. You can also send questions/suggestions to support@brickshelf.com. Kevin (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
 
(...) The randomizing of the recent pages was an experiment the 23 folders on each recent page were randomized but it still had the appropriate 23 folders by modification date. There have been some complaints so it is back to modification order. The (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR