 | | lugnet.va.nova —Kevin Loch
|
| | | I hate to suggest a new location group, but Northern Virginia (not just Arlington) should probably have it's own. In fact you could remove Arlington and replace it with nova and I doubt anyone would complain. KL (26 years ago, 2-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: lugnet.va.nova —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) Likewise lugnet.loc.us.in.sbd could be lugnet.loc.us.in.michiana. (And if it's kept South Bend, probably .sbn would be better, as that's the code for the south bend airport, and therefore the letters used on weather sites and so forth.) (26 years ago, 3-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: lugnet.va.nova —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | Well, Todd didn't differentiate for us folks on the other side of town, in the PG area of MD. I'll be mostly posting to the DC loc group, because when I tell people where I am, I just say, METRO D.C. area. I actually think that's more appropriate, (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: lugnet.va.nova —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) All the U.S. lugnet.loc.* groups are city-based, rather than state-based. The state is just listed there to help find the cities... Notice the Rock Island/Moline/Davenport group (one-third Iowa, two-thirds Illinois) and the Kansas City group (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: lugnet.va.nova —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Gurrk -- actually, there are a couple exceptions -- Hawaii and Alaska -- because of the very low relative populations. But other than that, state divisions in the hierarchy are really irrelevant... The only reason countries are relevant is (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
