 | | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) I did. I also thought about the implications or the extra-ordinary problem that would take Dave K to actually stand up and say something that runs contary to the 'status quo', at least where the administration is concerned. What about those (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) With due respect, what recourse do we have if an admin is found to be grossly unsatisfactory in some way? I'm not saying that any of them are, but what if it should occur? Does the average LUGNET member just sit around waiting for that admin (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) And that's what some of us are considering. What we are doing however, by pointing out that we are close to the edge is that people are making Lugnet unfun to run. If all the admins decide it's unfun, then Lugnet goes away. I hope everyone (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) I had difficulty resolving the grammar of Tim's line, but my final analysis was that Tim wasn't advotating any repurcussions from the admins directed at Chris for his posting about the cancelled competition here. But re-reading it, I'm more (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) May the first person that has never made a "speeling" mistake cast the first (tongue in cheek) inflamMatory spellcheck. snipped the rest (since it's just one post above) Hello, You brought up some interesting points, but I am a bit confused. I (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto) !
|
