 | | Re: Updated, enhanced LDraw shortcut images in FTX (Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX)
|
|
(...) Well actually it's 272 but I'll forgive that one :) (...) Thanks for your (and Dans) work on that! The result is great! Mmmmmmmm Dark Blue.... [LDrawPart 3298:272] ROSCO (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Updated, enhanced LDraw shortcut images in FTX (Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX)
|
|
Can you see them now? Good. Thanks to Dan Boger for setting up a feed between the Peeron and LUGNET servers, allowing the live LDraw parts images to be shared by both sites. So now the LDrawPart tag can not display all the current LDraw parts, it (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET not accessible due to traffic load
|
|
(...) I believe this isn't an issue of bandwidth limits, but of server load. When the server gets too busy, the CPU just doesn't keep up with all the requests, and the load goes up. And once the load hits a magic number (20, I think?) the server (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET not accessible due to traffic load
|
|
(...) I'm one but this is just me talking, not an official answer. I think the guesses are good though. (...) I have noticed it too... when Todd does, he looks into it. Lately, it usually has been spiders (webcrawlers, bots, whatever) hammering the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET not accessible due to traffic load
|
|
LUGNET Administrators, It seems to me that LUGNET is becoming increasingly not available due to traffic load. Is this perception wrong? If there is some truth to my perception, is there action that can be taken to reduce the dreaded unavailability (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) oh Bink I thought I left a hint for you there. Hit me up on AIM when you get a chance - I will let you know there. M *punches this back to plain textt* (20 years ago, 3-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Not sure I see exactly what you're getting at, Mark... could you elaborate where you think there's a specific problem? Thanks, Kelly (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Looks to me as they have a chance to prove you right -- right at this very moment. Did not take long in this 'new year' did it? Shall we sit back and see what, if anything happens? M (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) Maybe. But then abuse of the system would lead to time-outs, would it not? If the admins start to see the page leading to too much abuse, I guess maybe then would be a good time to look at removing it. (...) I don't think this is a question of (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New spotlight weights( was Re: LDraw shortcut images in FTX
|
|
(...) My entrie (first) post was about weighting and spotlighting. Nothing in the post was outside of that context, so there was no need to assume there was any more, or different, meaning to it. And no, I did not mean I wanted to see more of any (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
