|
|
 | | Open source and admin.suggestions
|
| (...) Is Lugnet going to become open source? If so, I think the answer to this and many other technical issues lies there. If not, then it would be interesting to know the reasons. On a personal note, I would most likely contribute in some manner (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Don't forget to VOTE !!!!
|
| (...) Unfortunately not. There was an intentional decision made to link the list with the Lugnet group. The only real way to block this would either be to break that link, or to require all posts be authenticated like any other post (which would (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) We are in the process of discussing use of .general. It is my opinion that .general should be used for things that no other better group exists for. If a particular topic is blossoming in .general, it may be time for a new group to be created. (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Don't forget to VOTE !!!!
|
| Um, Admins? What does this have to do with Lego and Lego robotics? Is there no way to filter posts (or otherwise fix the problems) that come from the crynwyr site? -Rob Entire message attached: "Liz Bilbro" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) It seems like the definition of what is on-topic for .general is very elastic. If a post shows up in .general which could conceivably show up in a more specific newsgroup, does that mean it's off-topic for general? If so, than the last 25 (...) (20 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
