To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1189
1188  |  1190
Subject: 
Re: lugnet.cad.dev (1999.03.24.1000) #794-799 (6 articles)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 26 Mar 1999 07:34:56 GMT
Viewed: 
566 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, tcourtney@avenew.com (Tim Courtney) writes:
Newsgroups: lugnet.cad.dev
X-Nntp-Gateway: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com
Message-ID: <199903241257.HAA24206@lugnet.com>
References: <199903241000.FAA16620@lugnet.com>
From: Tim Courtney <tcourtney@avenew.com>
X-Real-Life-Name: Tim Courtney
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 12:57:49 GMT
Subject: Re: lugnet.cad.dev (1999.03.24.1000) #794-799 (6 articles)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Tim:

PLEASE don't reply directly to digest messages -- when you do so, you
destroy the subject line as well as References headers crucial for proper
article threading.

As stated near the top of each digest message:

   To reply to a message within this digest, visit the Message Archive URL
   shown at the top of that message, then compose your reply using the web
   interface to the newsgroups.  Do not reply directly to this digest
   message or cut portions from it to make a new message.  Each message
   within this digest contains special identifications which must be
   preserved precisely for message threading.

Did you accidentally not read this, or did you think it wasn't applicable?

How about the header

   Reply-To: trash@lugnet.com (Do Not Reply to this message)

in each digest message, eh?  :-)

Please don't make me add code to the server to reject messages matching
subject lines that look like they came from a digest message.

Thanks,

--Todd


[followups set to lugnet.admin.general]



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: lugnet.cad.dev (1999.03.24.1000) #794-799 (6 articles)
 
(...) You have a good point there. I never really considered that, but it makes sense. (...) Right. I agree. However, the memorial navigation in my opinion is lacking, but the graphics are quick to load which is a plus. (...) Yep.. Well, I hope that (...) (26 years ago, 24-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR