Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.cad.dev (1999.03.24.1000) #794-799 (6 articles)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 12:57:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
973 times
|
| |
|
|
At 05:00 AM 3/24/99 -0500, Jeremy wrote:
> I'm just speaking for myself, but I think that this is because people would
> rather see a site now with content than an professional-looking one later
> that is easy to navigate. In other words, there are few reasons to give
> over the James Jessiman memorial, since it does the job well.
You have a good point there. I never really considered that, but it makes
sense.
> While the JJM could certainly use more sprucing up, it's not lacking by way
> of content and it's fairly easy to navigate anyhow. Plus (I don't think
> I've ever thanked Terry for this) it doesn't use image maps; all the
> navigation and cosmetic graphics load very very quickly.
Right. I agree. However, the memorial navigation in my opinion is
lacking, but the graphics are quick to load which is a plus.
> Which isn't to say that you shouldn't persue the ldraw.org plan. When you
> pull it off, I'm sure it'll be quite impressive -- and serve a need. I'm
> just giving my reasons for not saying anything about it until now.
Yep.. Well, I hope that over spring break I will have planning stages on
the project done. Also, I wouldn't mind some help from another Photoshop
owner with experience or someone who designs sites who can help with the
flow and navigational issues.
Keep Building!!
-Tim <><
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
New Lugnet Newsgroup? lugnet.off-topic.timmy.die.die.die ??
LEGO: SP++++c(6973)[ip++++ bt2++++ ex+++ ft+++ sp+++ ut++]
AQ+++(6175)[an+++ as++ hn-- sr--] TO++[ob+ dv+ tc-- tt-- tjr.---] TC++ CA+
PI+ BV--- DU--- HM--- S+ LS>+++ #++++ Hal M+ A+ YB82m
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
2 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
