 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:I451p6.234v@lugnet.com... (...) gotten (...) Is there any difference in beeing interested in Lego depending on your sexual orientation? How about a subgroup for communists, I bet they (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) ... (...) I've hesitated inserting my own comments (other than expressing agreement) on this subject until now -- but this is a question I feel comfortable answering. I believe my experience would be hurt by the addition of any or all of the (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) I think the counterargument to this is that _all_ the subgroups are for heterosexuals because we're in the majority. And the reason that you've gotten along just fine is that no one thinks you're weird (er...queer). (...) Could you possibly (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Meeting Announcements (was: Next NYCLUG Meeting)
|
|
(...) Yep I agree. Possibly put a link in the header of .events too. ROSCO (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Meeting Announcements (was: Next NYCLUG Meeting)
|
|
(...) Depends on the size/scope, I guess. A gray area. I suppose to answer the question at hand: the .announce group wasn't really intended to be used to announce small, local get-togethers. (...) I think reports (especially with photos, which may (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
