|
| | Re: Am I Not allowed to Post or not?
|
| I too have suddenly started to have problems with the email auth. I post via SMTP, but my last two attempts failed - just never got the auth email. Never had a problem before, always get the email almost instantly. Shouldn't be any email routing (...) (20 years ago, 29-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | Re: Un-spotlight?
|
| Sorry for the left (and wrong) "wrote" header, my previous post should be: I think un-voting is still a bad idea, even with a limited amount of votes this can already have an very adversary effect, see: (URL) that it is a clean voting process, (...) (20 years ago, 28-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Un-spotlight?
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, David Eaton wrote: I think un-voting is still a bad idea, even with a limited amount of votes this can already have an very adversary effect, see: (URL) that it is a clean voting process, please don't try to adjust it in (...) (20 years ago, 28-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Linking org.fr.freelug
|
| Todd, Larry, and all the others involved THANKS ;) In the name of FreeLUG, I can tell you this is a great news ;) Gael / Khan (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Un-spotlight?
|
| (...) I was really implying the number of votes, period. So if you see 3 cool MOC's you want to highlight, and 3 threads about politics you want to un-highlight, you can pick to highlight 2 MOCs and 1 politic thread, or all 3 politic threads, or (...) (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Un-spotlight?
|
| (...) I guess I was unclear on whether you were advocating a limitation on the number of "highlight" votes or on the number of "anti-highlight" votes per day. In general, though, I think the best solution (assuming we need one), is for more people (...) (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Linking org.fr.freelug
|
| (...) Thank you. Jason Spears | (URL) BrickCentral> | (URL) MichLUG> | (URL) CLB> (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | Re: Un-spotlight? (was: suspended Bricklink shops)
|
| (...) No, still bad. There will be the odd member that still uses his quota maliciously. And, as I explaned here: (URL) only took just such a similar limited amount of down-votes to disrupt the Lugnet Set Database ranking order severly. With (...) (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | Re: Un-spotlight?
|
| (...) IMHO that is exacly what has happenend here. Remember that it is a voting process, please don't try to adjust to archieve a result that's more in the line of your personal preferences. With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |