To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 11832
11831  |  11833
Subject: 
Re: Un-spotlight? (was: suspended Bricklink shops)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:20:56 GMT
Viewed: 
771 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, David Gregory wrote:
That's a very good idea.  As others have pointed out, it could cause trouble
in other ways though.  However, I think that if every member was given 5
Un-Spotlights to use per year, they would only use them when they thought it
really mattered.  This is just an idea I'm throwing out there.  I have no
clue how to implement it.

No, still bad. There will be the odd member that still uses his quota
maliciously. And, as I explaned here:
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=11823,
it only took just such a similar limited amount of down-votes to disrupt the
Lugnet Set Database ranking order severly.

With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Un-spotlight? (was: suspended Bricklink shops)
 
(...) That's a very good idea. As others have pointed out, it could cause trouble in other ways though. However, I think that if every member was given 5 Un-Spotlights to use per year, they would only use them when they thought it really mattered. (...) (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR