To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 11830
11829  |  11831
Subject: 
Re: Un-spotlight? (was: suspended Bricklink shops)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:46:48 GMT
Viewed: 
221 times
  
In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney wrote:
In lugnet.general, Brendan Coughlin wrote:
Can somebody PLEASE tell me why this crap deserves to be a "Top News Story"?!?!
Is it because it is Larry and he is "such a valued AFOL"?  Give me a break.
Keep issues as stupid as this one between whoever had a shop closed and the
Bricklink admin.  I don't come on Lugnet to read garbage like this.

This is exactly why I don't discuss Lego on Lugnet anymore

Get your priorities straight Lugnet admin!

Top news stories are member-selected. Paid LUGNET members can highlight or
spotlight posts which causes them to be listed in the top stories.

So, the post is at the top of the list because enough LUGNET members thought it
was important for people to read, not because of any one person.

The Top Stories list hasn't been manually compiled in years.

Which gets me thinking, why not also have a "un-spotlight" function? Not to
remove a spot light I've previously set (which I can already do), but to
subtract from the spotlights of others (subtract 100 or whatever from its points
value). So if I think a news item that has made the top stories isn't all that
newsworthy, I can vote to remove it.

ROSCO

That's a very good idea.  As others have pointed out, it could cause trouble in
other ways though.  However, I think that if every member was given 5
Un-Spotlights to use per year, they would only use them when they thought it
really mattered.  This is just an idea I'm throwing out there.  I have no clue
how to implement it.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Un-spotlight? (was: suspended Bricklink shops)
 
(...) No, still bad. There will be the odd member that still uses his quota maliciously. And, as I explaned here: (URL) only took just such a similar limited amount of down-votes to disrupt the Lugnet Set Database ranking order severly. With (...) (20 years ago, 27-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.general)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR