 | | Re: Question: Are reviews of non-LEGO (such as Mega Blocks) sets of interest? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) In January someone posted a review of a Best-Lock set using Joshua Delahunty's LEGO® set review form: (URL) logical to me that if someone thought it was OK to use the LEGO® set review form for non-LEGO® building sets, they might also think it (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Question: Are reviews of non-LEGO (such as Mega Blocks) sets of interest? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Most but not all. I'm a purist and I don't agree. Your call, of course, but I'd rather see off-brand reviews allowed and I'm glad we're having this debate. I just don't see it as a big issue, really. Supressing the reviews is not going to make (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Question: Are reviews of non-LEGO (such as Mega Blocks) sets of interest? —Mark Tarrabain
|
| | | | (...) Nope, actually, I don't agree. (seems what we actually were in agreement with a couple of weeks ago was just an exception huh? :) Best-Lock claims to have over a hundred different sets. LEGO has many, many times that number. LEGO has diversity (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
