Subject:
|
Re: Question: Are reviews of non-LEGO (such as Mega Blocks) sets of interest?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Mar 1999 12:15:57 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
LPIEN@IWANTNOSPAMantispam.CTP.COM
|
Viewed:
|
774 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "deteriorate" -- whether you mean that
> the threshold is 1% or 5% or 15% or 50% of postings -- but to me, even a
> single non-LEGO® review poisons the group, and I think most people being
> either purists or brand-loyalists would agree with that.
Most but not all. I'm a purist and I don't agree. Your call, of course,
but I'd rather see off-brand reviews allowed and I'm glad we're having
this debate. I just don't see it as a big issue, really. Supressing the
reviews is not going to make the clones go away, but a number of reviews
pointing out flaws may bring some waverers back into the fold.
Let a hundred flowers bloom.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
Stop the FDIC from spying on us! Go to
http://www.defendyourprivacy.com and sign the petition.
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
