Subject:
|
Re: Question: Are reviews of non-LEGO (such as Mega Blocks) sets of interest?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 00:20:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
760 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, markt@lynx.bc.ca (Mark Tarrabain) writes:
> > Another reason is that quite frankly, the clones'
> > sets are not diversified enough to warrant a substantial number of different
> > reviews.
>
> (Ahem :) I think that's debatable. Looking at the Best-Lock website, their
> product line is rather impressive -- (wouldn't you agree?) -- they have over
Nope, actually, I don't agree. (seems what we actually were in agreement with a couple
of weeks ago was just an exception huh? :) Best-Lock claims to have over a hundred
different sets. LEGO has many, many times that number. LEGO has diversity in its
favour, far and away surpassing any that I have ever seen.
However, if the charter for the lugnet.reviews group is not amenable to clone reviews
being posted there, then a separate group, or perhaps even using rtl, as one other
fellow in this thread suggested, may be the best alternative. Certainly it's not worth
getting into a heated debate over, since alternatives have already been suggested.
> > Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
