 | | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) Mark, You might be right about that...perhaps bringing out selfishness is a bit harsh, especially since there are so many of such different ages. But I also have to think that talking legal action (see (URL) )is taking it a bit far, too. I (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) Mark, You might be right about that...perhaps bringing out selfishness is a bit harsh, especially since there are so many of such different ages. But I also have to think that talking legal action (see (URL) )is taking it a bit far, too. I (...) (22 years ago, 4-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime Friday, January 31, 2003
|
|
(...) Update: The above upgrade was begun but not completed on Friday as planned. Downtime on Friday was on the order of 5 minutes for each of two reboots. Plan B, upgrading to a new and improved server box and transitioning everything (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) I think you are taking it a bit too far. I also am not losing sleep over this. But does that mean others should not want it, or be concerened about it? They were given the impression they would get one - so are they wrong for wanting it? Maybe (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) What's really sad to me is that people are so selfish about something as insignificant as this. I don't believe that of those 1000 members, all 1000 are pulling their hair out and stomping around the room with steam coming out of their ears (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
