 | | Re: finding a password
|
|
(...) what's your member number? (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | finding a password
|
|
How do I find out what my password is. It seems I forgot mine. =( Chris (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) You still missed a spot. Look where new members enter their postal address, and especially the IMPORTANT note: (URL) Straaberg, Denmark (URL) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) Same goes for 1793 but I was not expecting it, my attitude was more if I do receive something it would be cool. I apriciate all the work they (the ppl. behind Lugnet, Suz, Todd & more) have done along the road and I don't hold anything against (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
(...) Andy, I'm sorry there has been so much confusion about all of this. A large part of it is my fault. As of 14 Sep 2000 we intended to remove all mentions of member packets in the activation emails that go out. However, at that time, I missed a (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime Friday, January 31, 2003
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <todd@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:H9JEDv.7t3@lugnet.com... (...) YAAA...AAAYYY...YYY!!!...!!! -Rob (URL) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in news:Gq3r6t.9yF@lugnet.com: (...) I have to point out that I am member 1206, and I was promised that packet... (...) It would have been nice to have received notification of this via the lugnet e-mail (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime Friday, January 31, 2003
|
|
(...) But of course. --Todd (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime Friday, January 31, 2003
|
|
(...) Although you're the expert on this, may I stress the point of making a complete back-up prior to the operation? Oh, and make sure you test the back-up as well. You see, I work in IT and on several occasions, this fact was neglected, resulting (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime Friday, January 31, 2003
|
|
(...) Yes (...) Disk accesses should be significantly faster. How much of an impact this will have on overall performance is hard to predict. An educated guess might be 20% faster response, although I suppose it could be as little as 2% or as much (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
