 | | bug in polls?
|
|
I get 500 internal server error on this page (URL) William R Ward bill@wards.net (URL) Verbing weirds language. --Calvin (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
|
|
(...) Definitely multiple answers may apply, I guess I wasn't clear enough on that point. (...) One worry is that too many choices are presented here. I wonder if the last three before "other" could be a single choice. (...) Are any choices other (...) (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
|
|
(...) Me too. I think it's a great idea. Meta-polling seems like useful feedback for the poll conductor and for the community in general. I'd like it to be multiple-select, though, since it's possible that one or reasons more apply. How does the (...) (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Polls as propaganda devices.
|
|
(...) Good point. The poll, however, doesn't say that LEGO has to do anything per se, just that there is or isn't a problem with the track geometry. I like your suggested mandatory/automatic addons. (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Polls as propaganda devices.
|
|
(...) Actually, I had a bit of trouble with this poll. The reason is that I am now not convinced LEGO should put resources into alternative track geometries. On the other hand, it would be real swift to have some new track geometries, so my personal (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
