To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / *9546 (-10)
  Re: Sorting Air Safety (Re: Rooting out nests of snakes and destroying them)
 
(...) Is it time to put an end to this? Could Scott and Larry be banned from replying to each other for a trial period at least? just an idea, DaveL (25 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: New Building (brown)
 
(...) If the discussion was around how the module had bearing on the activities of other clubs, yes, otherwise no. (...) See above (...) No. Unless you somehow could tie it into the activities or operations of clubs. It's not enough to just say (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: New Building (brown)
 
(...) lugnet.trains.org? National and local train clubs/organizations for LEGO® enthusiasts: group formation, founding, planning, announcements, etc.; inter-group coordination and planning; general ideas, thoughts, inspirations, insights, (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: New Building (brown)
 
(...) That's all well and good but the *post* is primarily about buildings. Review the trains.org charter. Review the building and building.arch charters. If everything that was tangentially related to train organisations was posted there it would (...) (25 years ago, 16-Sep-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Looking for pieces from Pirate ship #6289
 
(...) I would think that the authentication date would replace the authored date when publishing. Thanks for the (guess) explanation. -Rob. (25 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Looking for pieces from Pirate ship #6289
 
(...) my guess is that while he wrote it on 13-sep-01, he didn't reply to the auth message until 2 hours ago, when the message was posted. does that make sense? :) Dan (25 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Looking for pieces from Pirate ship #6289
 
(...) The date on this message is 13-Sep-01 and shows up on the web interface between 14-Sep messages. It shows up as a 13-Sep message via NNTP. What's up? -Rob. (25 years ago, 14-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Lugnet 'Unsuitable for viewing).
 
(...) Now that the "Lugent" admin team has spoken, maybe you could ask a librarian? They'd be more likely to know what sort of filters are in place and what is likely to trigger them, since they presumably put the filters in place. I'd be interested (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Lugnet 'Unsuitable for viewing).
 
I can only assume that there's some site filtering going on there. Perhaps looking for a "news" subdomain? -Suz (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Lugnet 'Unsuitable for viewing).
 
Hi, Could one of the members of the Lugent Admin team please explain to me why when I attempted to access the lugnet newsgroups on the web earlier today (via a terminal in a local public library) the site was apparently blocked as being 'unsuitable (...) (25 years ago, 13-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR