To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / *8966 (-5)
  Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
 
(...) Ooh, Scott's sentence structure there is icky. There's some double negatavism going on, but the phrase "does it not belong" is usually intended to mean the same is "is it true that it belongs"... (...) One thing I strongly suggest you also add (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
 
Todd, (...) Well, that settles that. Thank you Todd for the clarification. Scott S. (25 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
 
(...) For the record, I did not say that bragging didn't belong here. (...) First, I have to take it face value; I'm not a mind reader. Lar has stated several times that it was a brag and not a flog. So be it. Second, flogs in theme groups are (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: Flogs, flogging, floggers, brags, bragging, braggers
 
(...) writes: (...) Lar, That may be because you have the ability to come off as sarcastic even when you might be sincere. Todd first took it as sincerity then after re-reading he took it as sarcasm. Perhaps your diction was a little too vague, even (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR