 | | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) It's not, no... But fortunately, there's a simple solution for future things of this type -- LD can (please) post to the .announce.lsahs group instead of the main .announce group. The .announce.lsahs group is specifically set up for LEGO Shop (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Good question. I don't think it is. I saw it, did a double take, got a little grated by it, but figured it was an honest mistake and given the tension lately with LD, I figured it best not to say something...for now. (...) --Todd (26 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
Jake McKee wrote in message ... (...) This is great that Jake is letting us know about this stuff, but is it appropriate in lugnet.announce? I have deliberately *not* been announcing my commercial stuff in .announce because I thought it was not OK. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet.lego.direct and its charter
|
|
(...) Hmm... after reading (URL) maybe my idea ain't such a good one. Oh well... it's just a bunch of plastic toys. What was I thinking anyway? :-P -Tom McD. when replying, to avoid non-stickage, use Pam on your spam. (26 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Lugnet.lego.direct and its charter
|
|
After reading the .lego.direct charter, I was unclear if this message (URL) was appropriate for the group. Further digging led to (URL) where I concluded that message #1854 was not appropriate due to its use of a "tabloid-like" tone. I have no (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
