 | | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
(...) You know what, I think you might be right. That may well be the "official signature" but I can't say for sure as I don't think it's codified somewhere easy to find. Happy to stand corrected, though, if someone knows differently. ++Lar (26 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
(...) I agree. (...) At times there are formal "Todd & Suz" type posts. I may be wrong, but I think these are always announcements? Scott A (26 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
Whoops, typo: Fix this: Is he claiming that's the view of the membership as a whole? It certainly isn't. I'm pretty sure it is, but clarity is essential. to read: Is he claiming that's the view of the membership as a whole? It certainly isn't. I'm (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
(...) And why shouldn't I have the right to point out irrational anti MS bias? Especially when it's posted in a non useful way, as I said. Todd does have a special responsibility to keep the line between his private persona and his public one (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
"Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G7JFp5.9sE@lugnet.com... (...) A bit confused with this statement... (...) No, it wouldn't. Member benefits would still be the same, just when you signed up to post, you would get a member (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
