 | | Re: Scheduled downtime 18 Jan 2001 for memory upgrade
|
|
(...) Todd, the system here is more reliable than my office network. I think we can all appreciate your hard work. I certainly do, my hat's off to you. (...) Geez, get some rest. I think we'll all live. (Although I did feel a little light-headed (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime 18 Jan 2001 for memory upgrade
|
|
(...) The memory upgrade is now complete -- although it wasn't 100% successful. The system's motherboard was reluctant to recognize any DIMMs in the 3rd slot, meaning we failed get to 768 MB and we are stuck with only 512 MB. It may be a faulty (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime 18 Jan 2001 for memory upgrade
|
|
(...) My apologies -- this didn't happen today as planned. My guy at the other end of the line (where the lugnet.com box is co-located) called in sick yesterday and today[1], so the upgrade is postponed. I'll post again when we have a new date and (...) (26 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: To LUGNET administrators - BRLUG
|
|
Todd, (...) I am really sorry about that. I will *never* do that again without your permission, you have my word on that. About user agent, let me check the documentation. The documentation don't say, but I guess it has "asphttp" on it. I am using (...) (26 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: To LUGNET administrators - BRLUG
|
|
(...) without first obtaining permission from the site's administrator or owner. It can be tempting to resort to such things, but fetching pages rapidly can cause a terrible load on a webserver, depending on what you're fetching. Crawlers or spiders (...) (26 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
