|
|
 | | Re: lugnet.org.it.itlug ?
|
| Giulio Ferrari wrote in message <38B9ABE2.53A8453A@iol.it>... (...) tempted (...) Just a though on these, how much of the above discussion are really locale specific, and how much are they just discussions in the Italian language? If the latter, I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: lugnet.org.it.itlug ?
|
| Mario Ferrari ha scritto: (...) IMHO I dont' really think we need a separate newsgroup for our LUG. There is no problem at all handling the two things (ItLUG and loc.it) together, indeed there are many advantages on having both on the same NG. A (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET spammed (was: Semiconductor Specific Search Engine)
|
| (...) The big reason that Lugnet is spam-free is that for most of it's content, you have to register to post, and spammers hate that. The only places this isn't quite accurate is when Lugnet interacts with a mailing list, as is the case with several (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: lugnet.org.it.itlug ?
|
| (...) Well, that's for you guys to decide! :) (...) It's very, very easy to set one up for you -- just let me know. (...) Well, if you had a dedicated .itlug newsgroup, then that would be for anything ITLUG-related. The current .loc.it group is (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Strangeness
|
| (...) Yes, with the current article indexer, the original text of cancelled messages are still indexed. No, this isn't desirable. (...) Yes, mainly for legal reasons. (But it doesn't logically follow from the fact that the text is still indexed. The (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
