| | Message indexing awry?
|
|
There appears to be something dicky happening with some message indexing. Example 1: (URL) should be attached to this post: (URL) 2: (in the same thread): (URL) should be a reply to: (URL) but appears beside it in the tree display. Example 3: (URL) (...) (18 years ago, 27-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Is this group in the right place?
|
|
I'm just wondering if this group should be under the lugnet.lego hierarchy, as the ambassador program is run by TLC? FUT: .admin.general ROSCO (18 years ago, 27-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.ambassadors)
|
|
| | Re: Some assistance please!
|
|
I understand, thank-you! (...) (18 years ago, 27-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Some assistance please!
|
|
Thank-you Rene. (...) (18 years ago, 27-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Some assistance please!
|
|
(...) (URL) (18 years ago, 25-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Some assistance please!
|
|
(...) I haven't (re)checked the lugnet ToU, but I'm pretty sure that part of the deal here is that people can only post under their real name. You might be in luck, though: I think at least one (URL) exception> has been made lately - but I could be (...) (18 years ago, 23-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
| | Some assistance please!
|
|
I was wondering if someone could offer some assistance! I've just entered into a government position the requires me to have my full name omitted from any web sites or internet documents. I joined Lugnet long ago when it first started up sith Suz (...) (18 years ago, 23-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006)
|
|
(...) It does make it harder to see posts from people providing updated information. The log of updates is probably generally of minimal interest. Having it available is nice, but I don't need to see it on a daily basis. Of course, I've been a (...) (18 years ago, 16-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006)
|
|
(...) Well, it's the best place I can think of for them, working from the assumption that lugnet.admin.database is the newsgroup for postings related to the LUGNET Guide. That assumption is not actually supported by the charter but no existing (...) (18 years ago, 16-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006)
|
|
(...) lugnet.admin.database doesn't seem to be a discussion group. The charter says "Set listings, theme/set/element datafication & esoterica, etc." To me that sounds primarily like a data dumping ground, although I suppose discussion of that data (...) (18 years ago, 16-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|