 | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) Mark, I'm sorry I didn't have time last night to formulate a proper reply to this. I sort of went to bed thinking about how best to explain my view to Frank.. Now I'll reply to his post directly. But here I just want to state that I didn't (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) Thanks Tim, Mark, and Jeff for resolving this. -Suz (20 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) Yes I should. I've just woken up (in the morning sense, not the metaphorical sense) enough to realise that my continued posting in this subthread is every bit as bad as your starting of it. Unless I see something I really disagree with I will (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) Jeff Stembel summed up my motives for response very well (better than I have so far) in his (URL) response> to Mark so I won't bother trying to explain them again. (...) I'm a bit suspicious as to why we are getting so many admins from BZPower (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) It seemed to me he was trying to show a percieved double standard. While I do disagree with the use of the term "flaming" here in this thread (I consider flaming to be a post in order to denigrate another individual openly and and for no (...) (20 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
