 | | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
--SNIP-- (...) Hi Rob, I wasn't interpreting your post at all. I realise that my response sounded a little harher than it was intended. Basically all I was trying to say was that you should have been more careful if you were posting an "ahhh, that's (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) I came to here by searching for quite a while after I read (URL) this post> of you Lenny. I searched because I was deeply impressed by the thought LUGNET could die in two month. And I hadn't even heard about this until now! I personally felt (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) [Note - I haven't read the other followups - I'm posting unbiased.] This is just not true. I think there are tons of people who care about LUGNET, but just feel they are not in a position to help out. I run a small server on this computer in (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) That's not what I meant. I didn't intend to imply causation - I would have been more direct about making that assertion. (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) Hello Tim. You have every right to have your own opinion on how to interpret my post. Misread, I can understand how someone might think that I thought Lugnet was never calm. This was not my intention. I just noticed heated debates more often (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
