 | | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) To be fair, I think that's what's being gauged at the moment. It's true that in recent years, Lugnet's importance as *the* place for Lego discussion has gone down. If I understand correctly, a big part of what's happening now is that Suz is (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
Dear Lenny, --SNIP-- (...) It was unneccasary in my opinion too. If it wasn't intended as a barb it should have been written more carefully, if it was it was unneccesary and rude. (...) I'm not sure I agree with your statement that people stopped (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) Well, I don't like the implication that Lugnet wasn't calm and peaceful BECAUSE of the Admins. As if we wanted everyone to call us names and be mean to us. But honestly, things get quiet because people stop caring. I mean, Suz has announced (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) random thoughts appreciated. random responses: - if developed for such, LUGNET could be self-supportive - You're right about "auto-pilot" but, so's not to worry at this moment.. I'm reading all the posts; Todd and I are in daily communication (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) There are those that say too much fiddlin' spoils the broth. I dunno, I'm of the opinion that if it ain't broke, then why fix it (for the most part) I'll support whatever Suz and Todd come up with as a plan for LUGNET. Dave K (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
