 | | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) Well, I don't like the implication that Lugnet wasn't calm and peaceful BECAUSE of the Admins. As if we wanted everyone to call us names and be mean to us. But honestly, things get quiet because people stop caring. I mean, Suz has announced (...) (19 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) random thoughts appreciated. random responses: - if developed for such, LUGNET could be self-supportive - You're right about "auto-pilot" but, so's not to worry at this moment.. I'm reading all the posts; Todd and I are in daily communication (...) (19 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Random thought of the day
|
|
(...) There are those that say too much fiddlin' spoils the broth. I dunno, I'm of the opinion that if it ain't broke, then why fix it (for the most part) I'll support whatever Suz and Todd come up with as a plan for LUGNET. Dave K (19 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Random thought of the day
|
|
I know that Lugnet is going through a big transition, and there is a possibility of its demise... I know lugnet can't be self supportive, can't run on autopilot forever, and needs people to upkeep the many areas (examples, memberships, curator (...) (19 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Website status and future plans
|
|
(...) Having read your blog, and having had some insight "behind the screens" I'd like to make the following comments and have some reactions on it, to see if the community could make some new form of LUGNET possible. The biggest value (IMHO) LUGNET (...) (19 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
