 | | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| (...) Well, Lenny, Larry and I have had some conversations, especially when the LPRV was first formed, and he acknowledged that he felt that Admins should be held to a higher standard hat on, or hat off. So Larry beleives there should be a double (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) That's what I'm talking about! I didn't think of that idea, good workaround, thanks. (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Hmm, I think it's actually both peoples issue to solve. SPAM is a real problem, but I have seen several providers take a lazy way out. Remember when Lugnet was incorrectly put on SPAM black lists? If it was only Lugnet's responsibility to (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Yes, honestly, I am. Not for me but for the other admins too. As I said, we had some situations in the past where emails (from other admins, NOT from me) went blocked or went lost and we, the admins, had no idea it happened. I agree that short (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Email Setups (was: Re: Badgering emails)
|
| (...) I think this issue can be boiled down to: 1. Official LUGNET email messages need to come from "*@lugnet.com" reply-to. Resolution: Each admin sets reply-to in their email client. Timeframe: Immediate. 2. To avoid spamblockers and spoof (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
