 | | Re: Another resignation: I'm stepping down.
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote: As with David, I was not going to reply till I saw my name in lights. (...) And I stand behind that 100%, it was a true and valid point and still is. And the fact that my post was spotlighted shows (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) I wasn't thinking of that, actually, but it could be done. Basically generate a signature of the user's settings, and cache the spotlight for that signature. That would mean that multiple people sharing the same config (skip filter + spotlight (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| (...) Huh. So, rather than keep an individual's ranked posts, you'd just keep an "everyone with settings in configuration X" sort of thing. Makes sense. I wonder if there could be a limited number of configurations to start with, in case it *is* a (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Spotlight Filter
|
| (...) Oops, my mistake-- I'm told there's a limit of posts within 10 days. Hence the re-ranking has to query all posts within 10 days (roughly 1000 posts at the current level of traffic). (That does admittedly make FAR more sense-- I always thought (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Spotlight Filter
|
| (...) I think the *best* thing to do would be to have users put their own rankings in. "Posts to .pirates get +2, posts to .fabuland get -1, posts by my buddy get +1, etc". But that means re-ranking things constantly, since there's no time limit (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
