 | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) I agree that people not highlighting isn't necessarily a bad thing, UNLESS those people then complain about what shows up in the spotlight. Instead of encouraging those dissatisfied people to highlight more often, the admins rejiggered the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) That's not really actionable, sorry. At least not for me anyway. (...) Great suggestions. However, they weren't clear to me, no... That is, they didn't jump out at me AS SUGGESTIONS at all. I've asked that posts that should be tracked as (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) I agree! IF everyone that cared about what hits the spotlight list consistently highlighted (or didn't highlight) things, you would be absolutely correct. (...) Right... We don't. BECAUSE, based on user comments, which we listen to carefully, (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
| (...) Thanks, Marc. That helps my understanding of the current scheme ... Shaun (21 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
|
