 | | Re: Suspend me as well (was Susp. of Chris and Terry)
|
|
(...) Now that's something different again. That means the ToU mean diddly squat, all that matters is the Admins' interpretation of them. So even if I agree to the ToU, I can still be suspended on the grounds that I broke the ToU, if the Admins all (...) (21 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
|
(...) "I never meant “indefinate” to mean “permanent” - rather, “suspended currently, for how long to be decided upon later.”" From (URL) this post>. I am not going to discuss this anymore. The Admins have made their decision. Thank you for your (...) (18 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Suspend me as well (was Susp. of Chris and Terry)
|
|
(...) I've been trying to help everyone understand. But you're right - I shouldn't have been doing that. I made the decision, with other Admins, and I am comfortable with it. As I have stated several times, I believe Chris broke the ToU, and whether (...) (21 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Suspend me as well (was Susp. of Chris and Terry)
|
|
(...) "Trying", yes. But the ToU cited does not mention anything about "trying". Nor should it. ROSCO (21 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Suspend me as well (was Susp. of Chris and Terry)
|
|
David Koudys wrote in message ... (...) an (...) at (...) Not "anything that happens on another website but pertains to someone who posts on LUGNET". This was specifically aimed at getting multiple people to harass someone (doesn't matter that it (...) (21 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
