 | | Re: SPAM and OT messages
|
| (...) It is certainly true that there is a considerable level of effort required to ensure an open access mailing list is free of spam. (...) I didn't see any complaints about the specific messages. I saw a question as to why there is a linkage (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) Hi! (...) Exactly why getting the FUT right is very helpful to the goal of keeping things well compartmentalized. (...) That's certainly not the intent, nor is it my perception. However if you could provide a few cites where you feel that's (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Open source and admin.suggestions
|
| (...) Is Lugnet going to become open source? If so, I think the answer to this and many other technical issues lies there. If not, then it would be interesting to know the reasons. On a personal note, I would most likely contribute in some manner (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Don't forget to VOTE !!!!
|
| (...) Unfortunately not. There was an intentional decision made to link the list with the Lugnet group. The only real way to block this would either be to break that link, or to require all posts be authenticated like any other post (which would (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) We are in the process of discussing use of .general. It is my opinion that .general should be used for things that no other better group exists for. If a particular topic is blossoming in .general, it may be time for a new group to be created. (...) (22 years ago, 2-Nov-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
