 | | Re: Next NYCLUG Meeting -- Saturday, October 2nd
|
|
(...) Hey Dave -- we're cool. Sorry about the little blowup on my part. Were you at the build event in Enfield last month, where we built those bugs? We may have even met. ;-) Looking forward to doing something with NELUG soon -- maybe after the (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) Though I agree in concept to what Tim is saying -- that LEGO brings people from different backgrounds together -- the reality is the LEGO community is fragmented. Precedent has already been set... we group discussions about space here, train (...) (22 years ago, 17-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:I451p6.234v@lugnet.com... (...) gotten (...) Is there any difference in beeing interested in Lego depending on your sexual orientation? How about a subgroup for communists, I bet they (...) (22 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) ... (...) I've hesitated inserting my own comments (other than expressing agreement) on this subject until now -- but this is a question I feel comfortable answering. I believe my experience would be hurt by the addition of any or all of the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) I think the counterargument to this is that _all_ the subgroups are for heterosexuals because we're in the majority. And the reason that you've gotten along just fine is that no one thinks you're weird (er...queer). (...) Could you possibly (...) (22 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
