 | | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
| (...) I think the topic of 'right level of notification/intervention' is worthy of public discussion. IMO, in this specific instance, the intervention was unnecessary. I hadn't read any 'debate' into the discussion, and any time 'NASA' and 'budget' (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Profanity Question (was Re: American Idolatry)
|
| (...) It's not censorious, it's a condition of usage. No censorship is involved. (...) My personal preference is no. An administrative answer is, stay tuned. Personal preference again: Hold off till the answer comes down. (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: American Idolatry
|
| (...) No. Your search does not demonstrate that it is necessarily OK or not OK, it merely unearthed incidents of use. The only conclusion to draw there is that the admins chose not to take action for whatever reason, not that using it is necessarily (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Profanity Question (was Re: American Idolatry)
|
| (...) Can I use such work arounds? Adr. (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | | | Addendum was Re: New Users Guide: Call for Volunteers
|
| (...) Best to contact me not using that email--as it is a junkmail pit. Use braun at NOSPAM history dot rutgers SPAMKILL dot edu. LFB (22 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
