 | | Re: Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
|
|
(...) I am trying to catch up, I was at a client all day today in SF (hearing the F line PCCs rattling by 8 stories below was particularly frustrating) that blocks LUGNET(TM) access as being "chat room" type.... so forgive me if this has already (...) (24 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: bug in polls?
|
|
(...) I get the same error (on both 19 and 21) but oddly not trying to get to other polls. It occured on first attempt and subsequent attempts, even after cold boot of the box. More info here: (URL) that helps track down the bug. Regards, Allan B. (24 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Polls as propaganda devices.
|
|
(...) It's there, it's under "Ivrit". (Of course I always found that funny - Todd likes to use the local names rather than English, but anyone able to read LUGNET probably knows how his/her country and language are spelled in English. ;-) ) BTW, the (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Meta-polling (was: Polls as propaganda devices.)
|
|
(...) I think the top two of the last three definitely could. Regarding the very last non-other choice, aren't there cases, though, where the question is phrased perfectly but the choices are biased? Or in those cases, is it always also the case (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: bug in polls? [DAT]
|
|
(...) It really should have a better error message, but I think it's working correctly to the spirit behind what it wants to let you do, albeit poorly explained in the text above. It wants to let you use the same number in the case of ties -- for (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
